Bitcoin deep dive: 15M BTC in self-custody as Binance withdrawals peak, derivatives switch to ‘risk-off’

0

Risk is off the table

Risk, leverage, and speculation could be considered the keywords for 2021 as excess cash from covid stimulus entered the stock market and crypto ecosystem. Many traditional financial assets have since returned to their pre-covid levels, such as Ark Innovation ETF, public equities such as Coinbase, and Bitcoin mining stocks making all-time lows. However, Bitcoin is still up around 5x from its covid lows.

BTC, Ark Innovation ETF and Coinbase Price: (Source: TradingView)

The introduction of derivatives was a big part of the 2021 bull run, which allowed investors to take on additional risk, and speculation. One avenue is futures open interest, the total amount of funds (USD Value) allocated in open futures contracts.

The 2021 bull run saw 72% of all collateral used for futures open interest was crypto margin, i.e., BTC. As the underlying asset is volatile, this would add further volatility and risk to leveraged position.

Percent Futures Open Interest Crypto-Margined: (Source: Glassnode)

However, as 2022 approached and risk collapsed, investors used as little as 34% of the margin in crypto. Instead, they moved to either fiat or stablecoin to hedge against the volatility, as either instrument is not volatile by nature. Crypto margin has been less than 40% since the Luna collapse, which indicates risk-off and has stayed flat for the remainder of 2022.


Drastic divergence in futures between 2021 and 2022

The perpetual swap funding rates during 2021 were mainly investors going long and indicated investors were increasingly bullish on BTC. However, funding rates in 2022 have been somewhat muted compared to 2021.

The average funding rate (in %) set by exchanges for perpetual futures contracts. When the rate is positive, long positions periodically pay short positions. Conversely, when the rate is negative, short positions periodically pay long positions.

Futures Perpetual Funding Rate: (Source: Glassnode)

Highlighted are areas when investors take the opposite direction and short the market. It just so happens it coincided with black swan events. Covid, China banning BTC, Luna, and the FTX collapse saw a huge shorts premium. This is usually a low in the cycle for BTC or a local bottom as investors try to send BTC as low as possible.

As a result of less leverage in the market, liquidations in 2022 have been muted compared to 2021, where investors were being liquidated billions of dollars in early 2021; 2022 is now just millions.

Total Futures Liquidations: (Source: Glassnode)

Volatility and put option premiums eroded

Implied Volatility (IV) is the market’s expectation of volatility. Given the price of an option, we can solve for the expected volatility of the underlying asset.

Over time, viewing At-The-Money (ATM) IV gives a normalized view of volatility expectations, which will often rise and fall with realized volatility and market sentiment. This metric shows the ATM IV for options contracts that expire 1 week from today.

After the chaotic year of 2022, the Bitcoin ecosystem is filtering out into a muted December. Options volatility has collapsed, which has done so after each black swan event, currently at multi-year lows of 40%.

Options ATM Implied Volatility – 1 Week: (Source: Glassnode)

This chart presents the Put/Call Ratio for Options markets, presented for Open Interest (red), and traded Volumes (blue).

When risk and volatility occur, puts tend to be placed at a higher premium which can be seen below. After the Luna and FTX collapse, the premium for put options eroded, which has also been a good indicator during this bear market.

Options Put/Call Ratio: (Source: Glassnode)

Retail taking self-custody

Illiquid supply just passed through 15 million coins held in cold or hot storage wallets. As the circulating supply of BTC is around 19.2 million, this would make up 78% of all coins in the circulating supply held by illiquid entities.

Illiquid Supply: (Source: Glassnode)

Self-custody has been a central focus due to the collapse of FTX, and in the past three months, the rate of change of illiquid supply has been the highest for over five years, showing that coins are leaving exchanges.

Illiquid Supply Change: (Source: Glassnode)

Understanding the investors taking their coins off exchanges is done through the metric, Net Transfer Volume from/to Exchanges Breakdown by Size.

Selecting below $100k insinuates retail transactions, which saw $160m being withdrawn on multiple occasions during the FTX collapse and, most recently, a large number of withdrawals from Binance, the week commencing Dec. 12.

Net Transfer Volume from/to Exchanges Breakdown by Size: (Source: Glassnode)

Mass exodus of coins leaving Binance

Binance saw unprecedented outflows of coins this week, leaving their exchange. Their proof of reserves fell by $3.5 billion, while Ethereum-based token withdrawals amounted to over $2 billion. However, they managed redemptions and withdrawals seamlessly.

Binance faced the largest stablecoin (BUSD+USDT+USDC) outflows in 24 hours, amounting to $2.159 billion.

Stablecoin Exchange Balance: (Source: Glassnode)

Binance has seen over 65,000 BTC leave their exchange over the past seven days. While its exchange balance depletes, they still hold around 3% of the Bitcoin supply on exchanges – just as the Bitcoin supply on exchanges drops below 12% for the first time since January 2018.

Percent Balance on Exchanges: (Source: Glassnode)

Credit: Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.